BOFIT Discussion Paper 20/2016: Political influence, firm performance and survival

Vladimir Sokolov – Laura Solanko

We examine how regional-level political influence affects firm financial performance and sur-vival. Combining representative survey data on mid-sized manufacturing firms in Russia with official registry data, we find that politically influential firms exhibit higher profitability and retain larger financial investments than non-influential firms. At the same time, we find no asso-ciation between regional political influence and access to bank lending. Most importantly, our empirical analysis suggests that the benefits of influence may be transient. Influential firms ex-perienced significantly lower growth during our 2004–2010 sample period than non-influential firms. Moreover, influential firms had a significantly higher probability of going bankrupt after the 2008 global financial crisis than non-influential firms.

Download the discussion paper on BOFIT website.

Tagit: Liiketoimintaympäristö, Politiikka

Ota yhteyttä

Sivuston ylläpidosta vastaa Aalto-yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulun Kansainvälisten markkinoiden tutkimuskeskus CEMAT (Center for Markets in Transition)

Aalto-yliopisto

Aalto-yliopisto
Kauppakorkeakoulu
Center for Markets in Transition (CEMAT)

Katuosoite

PL 21230 
00076 AALTO

Lapuankatu 2
Helsinki

Ota yhteyttä

Puh. 040 353 8336

cemat(at)aalto.fi

 

Viagra Cialis